Congressional Researchers Lay Out Lawmakers’ Options To Address Gun Ban For Marijuana Users Following Supreme Court Ruling
Congressional researchers have published analysis outlining legislative options for lawmakers following a recent Supreme Court decision that unanimously ruled the federal gun ban for marijuana users (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3)) is unconstitutional. The ruling creates potential conflict between federal firearms law and state cannabis legalization, requiring congressional action to reconcile the two.
Filed under Federal Action in THC Minnesota's coverage of Minnesota's cannabis and hemp market.
Mentioned
Source Attribution
This summary was compiled from information published by Marijuana Moment. All facts and statements reflect the original source material. For complete details, refer to the original publication.
View Original Source →Related Updates
Trump Proposes To Keep Protecting State Medical Marijuana Laws From Federal Interference While Blocking DC From Legalizing Recreational Sales
Trump Signs Order to Expand Access to Marijuana, Lower Taxes on Cannabis Businesses
Reclassifying Cannabis to Schedule III Substance
Trump signs cannabis rescheduling order (Newsletter: December 19, 2025)
Minnesota’s THC industry forced to pivot after Trump signs bill ending shutdown
Hemp ban in federal funding bill could end Minnesota’s THC edibles and drinks industry
Stay current on Minnesota cannabis
Browse more federal action updates, the full news feed, or the Minnesota cannabis timeline. Compare products across licensed dispensaries and read our consumer guides.